On December 11th, 2020 a home security company in Utah  had an alleged violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPR) announced that the Arkansas Attorney Generally reached a settlement with Alder Holdings, LLC. Alder charged higher activation fees to consumers with lower credit scores without providing a notice. 

The settlement terms include a $600,000 civil penalty that Alder will pay and they will have be required to provide proper notices to their customers in the future. Alder sells home security alarm systems by door-to-door selling. They have sold products and services to over 115,000 customers. When a salesperson sells an alarm system, the customer is entered into a long-term contract that contains monthly monitoring fees and an initial activation fee. Through monthly installments, the activation fee may be deferred. 

The alarm and monitoring material is sold to the customer at a much lower price than the retail value. Alder then recoups their costs and makes a profit through the deferred activation fee, monitoring fee, and the arrangement of the long-term contract. 

Alder grants that their customers have the right to defer payment of the activation fee and this arrangement qualifies as an extension of credit for FCRA purposes, according to the complaint. Not all customers of Alder are charged the same activation fee. Each customer is evaluated by Alder, and is evaluated by their credit score. The score determines the amount that the customer has to pay for the activation fee. The FCRA’s Risk-Based Pricing Rule regulates the practice of providing a less than favorable credit terms based on a review of a consumers credit report. This requires that that a company utilizing this practice must provide a Risk-Based Pricing Notice to the affected customers. This notice has to contain information about the consumers report, the identity of the provider of the report, and the customers rights under the federal law to obtain a copy of the report and include an option to dispute its accuracy, among other things. 

Alder failed to provide these notices to their customers, and has violated the FCRA and regulation V according to the complaint. 

Alder is also currently involved in a related litigation with the State of Arkansas in Arkansas state court. According to the terms of the settlement, if Alder will agree to pay $100,000 to settle the related state-court litigation, that amount will be offset from the $600,000 civil penalty in this case.